Greetings everyone,
New to the forum, joined to find info on the 2nd gen Valk.
A little bit about my (relevant) past bikes:
I owned a '98 Valkyrie, it was my come-back bike more than a decade ago now (previous bike was an R1), the Valk had the honda windshield and honda leather bags, highway pegs, ignition advancer and a belly fuel tank. Loved that bike, did lots of short trips on it and I was slowly turning the bike into a long distance tourer with the intention of riding cross Canada to the west coast and back.
However, the Valk had very turbulent air flow above 85km/h, and was just not that great on the highway. So I traded it in on a ST1300, which I loved and did the West coast trip (10,000km in a month) however life and work forced me to sell that bike shortly after.
Fast forward a decade,
I'm currently riding a '16 VFR1200X Crosstourer DCT, its Honda's big ADV bike, like the previous valk I love riding it, its loaded with lots of features, abs tcs cruise control, adjustable windshield, shaft drive, dct tranny etc etc, been doing lots of short 1-3 day trips on it, however its long distance touring ability is shorted mainly by its seat, plus being an ADV bike its very tall and top heavy, I've ridden gravel and dirt roads on it and would hate to drop it on the dirt. Having dropped it on asphalt it was hard enough to pick up (back was sore for days afterwards)
If anyone is curious, the DCT tranny is BRILLIANT! and its little wonder why Honda offers it on the new Goldwing, Africa Twin and a slew of other bikes.
Now why I'm thinking about the current Gen Valkyrie:
If I were to move away from an ADV bike, I'd like something that can still tour long distance and is great for 1-3 day trips and just general tooling around. I'm also thinking next year I'd like to ride to the west coast again, 10,000km round trip.....
The 2nd gen valk caught my eye when it was released in '14, but I never had the opportunity to ride one, but have ridden the F6B and (now) previous gen Goldwing ('17) both were very comfy, but "too much" too many buttons, too much weight, don't need it all. I prefer a simpler bike and the Valkyrie with some bags and a windshield "may" work?
A little more on the F6B,
A friend of mine had one, on a multi day ride on my (then) B-King, one ride on the F6B and the B-King was for sale... it was a fun hooligan bike, but sucked at touring. The F6B has always stuck in my mind (although its still heavy!)
So, Current Gen Valkyrie owners:
How comfortable is the Valkyrie compared to the F6B? (seat, wind protection, suspension)
Can the Valkyrie tour long distance in comfort? how is its air-flow at highway speeds? (I'm looking for turbulence free) Is the Honda windshield for the Valk any good? (I'm worried as my previous valk honda windshield sucked)
How is the weight compared to the F6B? I know the Valk is lighter, but does it feel lighter? easier to control?
Can the valkyrie be a bit sporty? handle twisties?
Thank you to anyone who read my post and is willing to help out a fellow rider!
Tazmool
New to the forum, joined to find info on the 2nd gen Valk.
A little bit about my (relevant) past bikes:
I owned a '98 Valkyrie, it was my come-back bike more than a decade ago now (previous bike was an R1), the Valk had the honda windshield and honda leather bags, highway pegs, ignition advancer and a belly fuel tank. Loved that bike, did lots of short trips on it and I was slowly turning the bike into a long distance tourer with the intention of riding cross Canada to the west coast and back.
However, the Valk had very turbulent air flow above 85km/h, and was just not that great on the highway. So I traded it in on a ST1300, which I loved and did the West coast trip (10,000km in a month) however life and work forced me to sell that bike shortly after.
Fast forward a decade,
I'm currently riding a '16 VFR1200X Crosstourer DCT, its Honda's big ADV bike, like the previous valk I love riding it, its loaded with lots of features, abs tcs cruise control, adjustable windshield, shaft drive, dct tranny etc etc, been doing lots of short 1-3 day trips on it, however its long distance touring ability is shorted mainly by its seat, plus being an ADV bike its very tall and top heavy, I've ridden gravel and dirt roads on it and would hate to drop it on the dirt. Having dropped it on asphalt it was hard enough to pick up (back was sore for days afterwards)
If anyone is curious, the DCT tranny is BRILLIANT! and its little wonder why Honda offers it on the new Goldwing, Africa Twin and a slew of other bikes.
Now why I'm thinking about the current Gen Valkyrie:
If I were to move away from an ADV bike, I'd like something that can still tour long distance and is great for 1-3 day trips and just general tooling around. I'm also thinking next year I'd like to ride to the west coast again, 10,000km round trip.....
The 2nd gen valk caught my eye when it was released in '14, but I never had the opportunity to ride one, but have ridden the F6B and (now) previous gen Goldwing ('17) both were very comfy, but "too much" too many buttons, too much weight, don't need it all. I prefer a simpler bike and the Valkyrie with some bags and a windshield "may" work?
A little more on the F6B,
A friend of mine had one, on a multi day ride on my (then) B-King, one ride on the F6B and the B-King was for sale... it was a fun hooligan bike, but sucked at touring. The F6B has always stuck in my mind (although its still heavy!)
So, Current Gen Valkyrie owners:
How comfortable is the Valkyrie compared to the F6B? (seat, wind protection, suspension)
Can the Valkyrie tour long distance in comfort? how is its air-flow at highway speeds? (I'm looking for turbulence free) Is the Honda windshield for the Valk any good? (I'm worried as my previous valk honda windshield sucked)
How is the weight compared to the F6B? I know the Valk is lighter, but does it feel lighter? easier to control?
Can the valkyrie be a bit sporty? handle twisties?
Thank you to anyone who read my post and is willing to help out a fellow rider!
Tazmool